new measurement of G

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Paul Doherty (
Date: Wed May 17 2000 - 10:08:09 PDT

Message-Id: <l0311070bb548825be239@[]>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 09:08:09 -0800
From: Paul Doherty <>
Subject: new measurement of G

  5 May 2000 2:00 PM

 Gravity Turntable Sets New Record

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA--Scientists have been scrutinizing gravity since the
time of Newton, but they've had difficulty measuring the power of its pull.
Now, thanks to a clever device, physicists have the most precise
measurement yet.

The strength of gravity, represented by the numerical constant "big G," is
quite puny--it takes a huge amount of mass to exert a palpable pull. Until
now, big-G experiments drew on a technique developed by physicist Henry
Cavendish at the end of the 18th century. He dangled a dumbbell-shaped
pendulum from a thread and placed heavy masses nearby. By measuring how
much the dumbbell twists due to its ends' attractions to the masses,
Cavendish obtained a fairly good measurement of big G. But in 1995,
physicists realized that there was a subtle bias in Cavendish-style torsion
experiments: The string or wire that suspends the pendulum is not perfectly
elastic, thus distorting the measurement.

Enter the big-G whizzes at the University of Washington, Seattle. Physicist
Jens Gundlach and his colleagues eliminated the string-twisting bias by
mounting a flat pendulum--eliminating some geometrical modeling problems of
the dumbbell--on a turntable that slowly rotates about once every 20
minutes, bringing the pendulum's ends toward and away from four 8-kilogram
steel balls. As the pendulum tips get close to the balls, they feel the
increased gravitational force and the pendulum begins to twist.
Immediately, a laser sensor triggers a switch that accelerates the
turntable, counteracting the torque. Instead of the string twisting in
response to the gravitational acceleration, the turntable turns. The speed
of the turntable yielded a measurement of big G with an error of a mere 14
parts per million--about 10 times more precise than ever before.

"[It] should have been obvious" that previous measures of big G were off,
says physicist Randy Newman of the University of California, Irvine. The
new result, announced this week at the American Physical Society meeting,
sets big G tentatively at 6.67423 0.00009 x 10-11 m3/(kg s2). "It's one
of the fundamental constants," Gundlach says. "Mankind should just know it.
It's a philosophical thing."


ScienceNOW -- 2000 (505): 2
Science Online
2000 by the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Paul "But it is more complicated than that!" Doherty,
Senior Staff Scientist, The Exploratorium.,

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 19 2000 - 11:10:49 PDT